CERN physicists trap antihydrogen atoms for more than 16 minutes
June 5, 2011This is an artistic representation of the ALPHA neutral antimatter trap, suggesting the nature of the ALPHA apparatus as a container for antihydrogen. Credit: Chukman So, copyright © 2011 Wurtele Research Group. All rights reserved.
Trapping antihydrogen atoms at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) has become so routine that physicists are confident that they can soon begin experiments on this rare antimatter equivalent of the hydrogen atom, according to researchers at the University of California, Berkeley.
Barracuda Spam Firewall - 50,000 customers worldwide. No Per User Fees. Free Eval! - www.barracudanetworks.com
"We've trapped antihydrogen atoms for as long as 1,000 seconds, which is forever" in the world of high-energy particle physics, said Joel Fajans, UC Berkeley professor of physics, faculty scientist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and a member of the ALPHA (Antihydrogen Laser Physics Apparatus) experiment at CERN in Geneva, Switzerland.
The ALPHA team is hard at work building a new antihydrogen trap with "the hope that by 2012 we will have a new trap with laser access to allow spectroscopic experiments on the antiatoms," he said.
Fajans and the ALPHA team, which includes Jonathan Wurtele, UC Berkeley professor of physics, will publish their latest successes online on June 5 in advance of print publication in the journal Nature Physics. Fajans, Wurtele and their graduate students played major roles in designing the antimatter trap and other aspects of the experiment.
Their paper reports that in a series of measurements last year, the team trapped 112 antiatoms for times ranging from one-fifth of a second to 1,000 seconds, or 16 minutes and 40 seconds.
Since the experiment first successfully trapped antihydrogen atoms in 2009, the researchers have captured 309.
"We'd prefer being able to trap a thousand atoms for a thousand seconds, but we can still initiate laser and microwave experiments to explore the properties of antiatoms," Fajans said.
In November 2010, Fajans, Wurtele and the ALPHA team reported their first data on trapped antihydrogen: 38 antiatoms trapped for more than one-tenth of a second each. They succeeded in capturing an antiatom in only about one in 10 attempts, however.
Toward the end of last year's experiments, they were capturing an antiatom in nearly every attempt, and were able to keep the antiatoms in the trap as long as they wanted. Realistically, trapping for 10-30 minutes will be sufficient for most experiments, as long as the antiatoms are in their lowest energy state, or ground state.
ACS Chem Neuro Free Issue - Peer-reviewed journal on molecular mechanisms in Neuroscience - pubs.acs.org/acscn
"These antiatoms should be identical to normal matter hydrogen atoms, so we are pretty sure all of them are in the ground state after a second," Wurtele said.
"These were likely the first ground state antiatoms ever made," Fajans added.
In an antihydrogen atom (top), a positively charged antielectron, or positron, orbits a negatively charged antiproton: the mirror image of an ordinary hydrogen atom (bottom). Credit: Chukman So, copyright © 2011 Wurtele Research Group. All rights reserved.
Antimatter is a puzzle because it should have been produced in equal amounts with normal matter during the Big Bang that created the universe 13.6 billion years ago. Today, however, there is no evidence of antimatter galaxies or clouds, and antimatter is seen rarely and for only short periods, for example during some types of radioactive decay before it annihilates in a collision with normal matter.Hence the desire to measure the properties of antiatoms in order to determine whether their electromagnetic and gravitational interactions are identical to those of normal matter. One goal is to check whether antiatoms abide by CPT symmetry, as do normal atoms. CPT (charge-parity-time) symmetry means that a particle would behave the same way in a mirror universe if it had the opposite charge and moved backward in time.
"Any hint of CPT symmetry breaking would require a serious rethink of our understanding of nature," said Jeffrey Hangst of Aarhus University in Denmark, spokesperson for the ALPHA experiment. "But half of the universe has gone missing, so some kind of rethink is apparently on the agenda."
ALPHA captures antihydrogen by mixing antiprotons from CERN's Antiproton Decelerator with positrons – antielectrons – in a vacuum chamber, where they combine into antihydrogen atoms. The cold neutral antihydrogen is confined within a magnetic bottle, taking advantage of the tiny magnetic moments of the antiatoms. Trapped antiatoms are detected by turning off the magnetic field and allowing the particles to annihiliate with normal matter, which creates a flash of light.
Because the confinement depends on the antihydrogen's magnetic moment, if the spin of the antiatom flips, it is ejected from the magnetic bottle and annihilates with an atom of normal matter. This gives the experimenters an easy way to detect the interaction of light or microwaves with antihydrogen, because photons at the right frequency make the antiatom's spin flip up or down.
This is an artist's image of the ALPHA trap which captured and stored antihydrogen atoms. Credit: Chukman So
Though the team has trapped up to three antihydrogen atoms at once, the goal is to trap even more for long periods of time in order to achieve greater statistical precision in the measurements.The ALPHA collaboration also will report in the Nature Physics paper that the team has measured the energy distribution of the trapped antihydrogen atoms.
"It may not sound exciting, but it's the first experiment done on trapped antihydrogen atoms," Wurtele said. "This summer, we're planning more experiments, with microwaves. Hopefully, we will measure microwave-induced changes of the atomic state of the antiatoms."
More information: "Confinement of antihydrogen for 1000 seconds," Nature Physics, http://www.nature. … s/index.html
just added
Rank: not rated yet
Oh yea, NASA contracting out work for independant space company's to take cargo up, that's a sign of giving up on the space program. Oh yea, NASA providing grants to private space programs ... another sign NASA is giving up on space.
What a stupid person. Do you have any idea how bloated and inefficient the government is? Contracting space program work out to private companies is the most cost efficient and effective method to advancing possible.
The decisions are incredibly strategic and intelligent, you're just too naive to see the whole picture, you're blind to reality and filled with paranoia and delusion.
Is it seriously that difficult for you to do some grown-up level research before blabbering on like that?
Let me guess, you're actually hate Obama because he's black, and all this BS is a way of skirting around your real problems? Because where I stand it's amazingly obvious that NASA has not given up on space, at all.
16 hours ago
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (9)
15 hours ago
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (4)
side note: anti-matter energy "force field" in combo w/ an EMF field ?? (it's getting better for interstellar! :p )
15 hours ago
Rank: 3.4 / 5 (8)
15 hours ago
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Hardly. The energy it takes to create one atom of anti-hydrogen is atrocious. Don't count on this being the 'interstellat fuel' of tomorrow.
This is important in other respects. wWhen we can store some anti hydrogen atoms for a long time we'll finally be able to test whether antimatter reacts to gravity the same way as matter does.
15 hours ago
Rank: not rated yet
How long a time do you suppose would be long enough?
14 hours ago
Rank: not rated yet
I like the potential implications in understanding very much.
"Rethink" beats a "reboot" hands down.
14 hours ago
Rank: not rated yet
@Telekinetic - From the last article, the scientists seem to think 1000 seconds would be enough, they probably just need to add a cooling device. --
12 hours ago
Rank: not rated yet
No need to speculate it says what they need in the article.
12 hours ago
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (2)
Now I may be a physics dunce here but what happens to the kinetic energy in a matter/antimatter collision? Obviously it would have to convert to something else in order to be conserved so... Annihilation Energy plus KE(matter) plus KE(antimatter) = Sumation of Energy released? So... the faster your ship is going the more energy is released therefore the faster you can make your ship go? *queue evil laugh*
11 hours ago
Rank: not rated yet
10 hours ago
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
While interesting, this research is unlikely to substantially benefit humanity, and with Rabid Conservatives threatening to defund all of government, we can be assured that if the Republican plan succeeds, then all science funding in America will be cancelled.
10 hours ago
Rank: not rated yet
You would have 1.8 E 11 Joules of pure energy that would consist of all known fundamental particles, and which would degrade largely into electrons, protons and their anti-particles (what you started with), along with gamma rays, neutrino's and other less reactive/ more stable particles.
10 hours ago
Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
And that little children is why America is out of the space business but the socialist states of India, China, Japan, Europe and Russia aren't.
9 hours ago
Rank: not rated yet
You are correct. Only a matter of time before most of the private sectors for space programs follow suit and outsource everything too. Then the Us will be a museum.
9 hours ago
Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
The reason why we are out of the manned space launch business is because we spent 9 billion on a now cancelled constellation program over the course of 4 years. 9 billion and they didn't even start building anything, just plans. How do you even spend 9 billion without producing anything? SpaceX spent 800 million over 10 years existing and orbited and recovered a capsule. Orbital and Blue Origin have spent similar money and haven't launched yet but at least have equipment built.
Didn't Boeing recently get caught bribing officials while trying to get the new tanker contract from the military? Someone aught to audit Constellation because 9 billion is a lot for a couple rough draft blue prints.
9 hours ago
Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
8 hours ago
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
8 hours ago
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
7 hours ago
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
7 hours ago
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
@Turritopsis - Wow, too many factual errors to count. Seriously, that reads almost like delusional science fiction - just enough real concepts and science vocabulary to make it sound like you know what your talking about, but all of your key assumptions are just wrong.
1 - "individual quanta of space time" That is pure fiction. Space Time cannot be broken into quanta.
2 - "The singularity influences in infinite spacial directions... Matter is point energy." Now we're starting to get delusional.
3 - "Point energy has directionality (charge), the charge on earth is uniformly polarized." More pure fiction.
I could go on, but it just gets more delusional.
7 hours ago
Rank: not rated yet
How would you plug your interpretation into the Many Worlds Interpretation?
1 hour ago
Rank: not rated yet
Although I cannot get my head around the topology of negative gravity in space/time. Could the anti-matter have been propelled backwards through time at the same rate as we are being propelled forward? So many questions, such a little brain.
52 minutes ago
Rank: not rated yet
This work was done at CERN (which is not in the US)
agreed. Take an introductory science course (or spend 30 minutes on wikipedia) before stating these kinds of hypotheses. You'll easily be able to figure out that they are ridiculous.
1 minute ago
Rank: not rated yet