These days nominalists label pretty much everything based upon impressionistic feelings even though they may claim otherwise. As the banner above conjures you the reader of this blog: examine the deep seated axioms and assumptions. What are the reigning axioms of the current scientific establishment?
One would have to be purblind not to immediately answer to that question -- statistics. The idea that in the realm of the infinitesimal our observational senses are forever enmired in irreconcilable uncertainty. So what to do? Quantum mechanics! A wave function based upon an imaginary Cartesian infinite array or matrix of probability. How certain are we that this should be the case? Well as the statisticians like to say a very high sigma. Since after all it works.
However, when we try to extend this fine edifice from the infinitesimal quantum to the astrophysical we find ourselves in a crisis of inconvenient, well, "darkness." Could this have anything to with the methodological and radical assumptions underlying the latest flavor of irrationalism masquerading as sanity? Hmm.
Maybe when the foundation of a belief structure is unsound that much is inevitable. Perhaps we can be certain of it.
Eratosthenes first measured the circumference of the earth from the shadows cast by the sun. Today, humanity's fitness to survive will be measured by our ability to conquer that same thermonuclear fusion that casts those shadows. Thus, Prometheus will truly be unbound.
Sunday, May 05, 2019
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment